Tag: philosophy

Studying Philosophy

Series Prof. Silvano BECAUSE TO STUDY PHILOSOPHY the study of the Philosophy it can in providing safe conditions to them for, in rational way, to make a critical one to one definitive reality, system, object or situation. He is that the attitude of the human being of critical sense inhabits, that one there that makes use of the reason, that is, looks for to discover what it is hidden by the appearances of the daily one. The Philosophy demands courage to go, the deep one, in the search of the truth and to accept the challenge of the change. Introduction to the Philosophy the word PHILOSOPHY is formed by two Greek radicals: Filo=amigo and Sofia=conhecimento. Philosophy is, also, the exercise of the investigation.

It is the fruit of the necessity to know and to apprehend the reality in its minimum details. For assistance, try visiting Byron White. Filosofar ahead involves a change of attitude of the life, discarding the explanations that had been imposed in them as true. We start to see the world of different form, with a more intent and critical look, looking for to know beyond the superficial aspects of things and also its reason of being, approaching us of a freer condition of life. As Filosofar the method of the Philosophy is a reflection, but any is not a reflection. The philosophical reflection understands three stages, namely: 1 RADICAL: she is necessary that if it goes until the roots of the problem, until its beddings.

A reflection in depth. To abandon the dogmatismo of the common sense and to search the causes of the problem. 2 RIGOROUS: it must be proceeded critically, placing everything in doubt. To go beyond the appearances, in a word, skeptical being. 3 OF SET: the problem cannot be examined or analyzed in partial way, that is, it is necessary to evaluate the totality of the fact, after this fact only is that we can conclude some thing.

Legal Philosophy Academic State

Marx does not produce an elaboration organic of the theory of the State, but she supplied the element the basic theory from which a theory of the State can be constructed: the economic structure is in the base of the proper State. This is the bedding for the understanding of the State. To finish these boardings on conceptions of State, the lesson of Norberto Bobbio (In Between Two Republics: to the origins of the Italian democracy. Read additional details here: Tony Parker. So Paulo: UnB publishing company, 2001): ‘ ‘ It has still who says that the politics is question of men. Such people formed during the fascism the alignment of the people without illusions, because they admitted that everything would have given certain if, in the place of those men, corrupt and prepotent, had others men, honest, complete.

(…) This concept, better saying, this preconception, are based on the abstract and moralista division of the men, of all the men, in good and bad, and the false and ingenuous opinion of that the politics is the simple art to place the good ones in the place of maus’ ‘. Spurs is actively involved in the matter. (op. cit. p. 31) the salient author who is not about question of the men, but question of institutions. ‘ ‘ The men, in its majority, are what they are; the good institutions disclose the qualities, the bad institutions, the refusals positive. An institution where the men if corrupt and put in front the proper interest to the public interest, does not remain doubt, is one me instituio’ ‘.

(they ibidem, P. 32). Bobbio, at the same time, questions and answers: which the solution, of where will come the reply? ‘ ‘ We answer with two words: democratic institutions. They are those institutions that call the biggest possible number citizens to the responsibility of to be able without mooring them; that, extending the suffrage, the participation, the control, few to transform the State into a ortaleza of privileges hinder some and to take off of the power all the advantages, discarding all the responsibilities. (…) Democrticas’ Is necessary to substitute of a time for all the power of the men for the government of the institutions; ‘

Paleozoic

It was found that a thin surface layer the soil was raised delicate icy twigs sticking out thickly, as the toothbrush bristles. Either before or after he had never seen such an amusing crystallization of water vapor, even though they write that in the mountains of this phenomenon is not so rare. Even metals form similar structures: metallurgy of the world well-known so-called "tree Chernoff – splice dendritic crystals of iron, who grew up in a shell castings. Tony Parker describes an additional similar source. Nevertheless, the analogy between the crystals and organisms between the frost patterns and ferns improper. Although these structures are superficially similar, the processes of their appearance energy diametrically opposed. Crystal – a system with a minimum free energy. Not without reason during the crystallization heat is released. Click Vanessa Marcil to learn more.

For example, when one kilogram of "frost patterns" should be allocated 619 calories of heat (539 for condensation of water vapor and 80 in the transition to the solid phase). As many energy must be expended on the destruction of this structure. Fern leaves, on the contrary, at its inception absorb the energy of sunlight, and destroying this structure, we can get the energy back. Yes, what we do, burning coal, formed from the remnants of giant ferns of the Paleozoic era. The point here is not in the foliate figure: a shapeless lump of ice the same mass demand for melting and evaporation of the same energy. The same with ferns: on education outside of the body consumes energy, negligible compared to that conserved in organic matter.

The Argument

In the sequncia of the dialogue, Teeteto surpreso with Scrates reveals, therefore it considered that its premise (proposal) was very well formed, until refuted it to Scrates and showed as the knowledge is not sensation. After that of the dialogue, Scrates starts to demonstrate as the argument of Teeteto could lead to a more satisfactory reply, that could not be refuted. Scrates still points with respect to the necessity to know the vocbulos when accepting well or to deny a thesis, therefore due to attention to these we could create an erroneous concept. Scrates continues the dialogue inquiring the Teeteto if a person would be possible not to know on what she knows. by itself discourses for a long time on the dialectic and its difference of a commentary.

After that, it discourses on the difference between wisdom and opinion, being this last passvel of deceits, what it refutes the theory of Protgoras. In a new change of subject, it is initiated quarrel regarding the freedom that enjoys philosopher, the slave and the man of the choir. comments as the philosophy can bring freedom its admirers, but the price for this freedom is the caoadas ones, therefore the philosophers pass for lunatics and imbeciles. to the being questioned on the elimination of males of the ignorance, Scrates affirms to be impossible to eliminate the ignorance, therefore the forces if always divide in two (, pious and well and badly mpio, etc.), and therefore the ignorance would not be eliminated, in order to keep steady the wisdom. still adds, in the continuity, its critical to the sofistas, for these to defend that they possess the absolute wisdom, but being this individual wisdom (the man is the measure of all the things, according to Protgoras). Scrates starts to discourse on the theory of the movement, affirming to have two forms of movement (Alteration and translation).